| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

MatrixSkye Mk2
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.04.28 23:58:00 -
[1]
Edited by: MatrixSkye Mk2 on 28/04/2010 23:57:53
Originally by: Deja Thoris With a proposal like this with eve in its current form it would just be local full of cloaky ***gots screaming "boom headshot!!!" every time someone enters local because the game offers no intel tools other than a half baked directional scanner.
This.
Find a way to balance it so it doesn't lean so much in favor of the predator and you have my support. Otherwise, no.
Grief a PVP'er. Run a mission today! |

MatrixSkye Mk2
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.04.29 10:55:00 -
[2]
Originally by: darius mclever (I dont know where i saw this, so if someone finds the link please add it)
How about this: you jump into a system and wont be shown in local for the say first 30-60seconds. when the time is over, you will be shown in local. All people already in local before you get shown normally after you jump in.
I can see how this helps pirates and opportunistic PVPers, but how does it help everyone else?
Grief a PVP'er. Run a mission today! |

MatrixSkye Mk2
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.04.29 16:14:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Pheusia
Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2
Originally by: darius mclever (I dont know where i saw this, so if someone finds the link please add it)
How about this: you jump into a system and wont be shown in local for the say first 30-60seconds. when the time is over, you will be shown in local. All people already in local before you get shown normally after you jump in.
I can see how this helps pirates and opportunistic PVPers, but how does it help everyone else?
Helps them compete against macros...?
So as long as it's in the name of the good 'ol macro fight it's OK that it will screw everyone else. Let's get to it then!
Grief a PVP'er. Run a mission today! |

MatrixSkye Mk2
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.04.29 21:44:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Ephemeron Then all the lazy bears...
If by lazy bears you really meant lazy pirates looking for easier ganks then yes, I agree, removing local is the way to go.
Grief a PVP'er. Run a mission today! |

MatrixSkye Mk2
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.05.01 01:55:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Bellum Eternus
Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2
Originally by: Ephemeron Then all the lazy bears...
If by lazy bears you really meant lazy pirates looking for easier ganks then yes, I agree, removing local is the way to go.
WTF are you even posting in this thread? It doesn't concern you. You never set foot out of 1.0 space anyway. 
Leave the big boy play areas to the adults.
Mr. Bellum, you know this for a fact how? I'm sorry to break it down for ya, but when you create a thread you realize people are allowed to post their opinions in it? You sound mad. The only advice I can give you is you need to calm down and let people disagree with you. mkay?
Grief a PVP'er. Run a mission today! |

MatrixSkye Mk2
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.05.02 01:09:00 -
[6]
Edited by: MatrixSkye Mk2 on 02/05/2010 01:12:20 There needs to be a happy medium between the hunted and the hunter. Taking away local skews things too much in favor of the hunter.
If removing local is the only change made then it allows the hunter to scan and probe when and as leasurely as he pleases, while someone doing any PVE activity will have to do it ALL THE TIME he is out. And making Eve a game about spamming a button in order to not get ganked is just wrong.
And no, having a bigger blob isn't the solution either. This plan needs to be complete. It can't be some half-worked-up plan that only favors the hunters and screws the hunted. It needs to be balanced before we even consider voting on it.
Grief a PVP'er. Run a mission today! |

MatrixSkye Mk2
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.05.03 13:52:00 -
[7]
Originally by: RuleoftheBone Supported.
W-space proved the concept.
W-space proved that no local works in W-space. That's it. The mechanics between K-space and W-space are different and the "success" (or lack thereof) in K-space can and will vary.
Grief a PVP'er. Run a mission today! |

MatrixSkye Mk2
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.05.04 00:17:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Ephemeron OK lets separate the pussies from hardcore people with new regions. Nobody will force you into big scary no-local space, just don't let your fear get in the way of other people's fun
Confirming that those wanting a balanced implementation are pussies.
Grief a PVP'er. Run a mission today! |

MatrixSkye Mk2
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.05.04 00:32:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Ephemeron Since when is refusal to change status-quo considered wanting a balanced implementation?
that's like the Republicans on healthcare.
My argument was against people who want to do nothing.
Perhaps if you read Deja's post instead of spewing mindless and childish insults you'd have noticed he is actually FOR a change of the status quo. He even goes as far as suggesting AN IDEA, which you simply refute with "BAH, YUR A *****", instead of adding to it or being somewhat more open. A change like this NEEDS BALANCE, Whether you like it or not.
Grief a PVP'er. Run a mission today! |

MatrixSkye Mk2
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.05.04 10:52:00 -
[10]
Edited by: MatrixSkye Mk2 on 04/05/2010 10:53:59
Originally by: Ephemeron This is exactly the Republican defense strategy - deny everything, create an illusion of alternative plan, never show it to anyone, refuse to cooperate, stall.
It's funny that you keep bringing up "republicanism" to attack those that disagree with you.
But think about it. Who are the ones wanting to play cowboy shooting everyone without regards to anyone else or without balance? Who are the ones that are willing to make **** go their way without concern on what the majority of players think or without concern on how it might affect the overall health of the game? Who are the players that usually resort to insulting and demeaning someone for proposing an idea even remotely championing carebearism? You got. That's you. The real repuclicans of the game. You are the elite cowboys that don't give a **** about anyone else but yourselves.
Grief a PVP'er. Run a mission today! |

MatrixSkye Mk2
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.05.07 11:31:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Bellum Eternus ąstupidity in this threadą
The irony of your posts is amusing.
Originally by: Bellum Eternus Eve is just going to continue down a path that makes the game softer and friendlier to stupid people
The only way Eve will head down that path is if CCP started listening to lazy players such as yourself, always wanting to buff YOUR toys and handicap your targets. Have you noticed that all you do is whine about making things easier for you? And then you have the galls to complain about people wanting this game on easy mode? ThatĘs YOU. You are the one wanting to play Eve on easy mode, Bellum.
Originally by: Bellum Eternus quite the opposite: its' going to become even more carebear oriented with all the 'toning down' and 'hand holding'.
Until you realize that YOU are the carebear begging CCP to make YOUR profession easier than the rest this is all pointless. Seriously, Bellum, you sound bitter. You throw tantrums when people disagree with you. You accuse CCP of ęgoing softĘ when they donĘt buff/nerf the things you want. You have to take a few steps back and look at the bigger picture. Realize that this game needs balance. And that suggesting half-baked ideas like removing local without keeping things balanced isnĘt the way to go. And if CCP ōisnĘt listeningö to you that it might be because what you think is an awesome idea might not be that awesome. The clues are there. You just have to open your eyes to see them. Or, you could just continue calling people wussies and carebears for not agreeing with your ideas, which honestly, I think is more likely :P. But the only one that ends up looking like a carebear is you.
Grief a PVP'er. Run a mission today! |
| |
|